Layered materials, especially the electro-chemical insertion of graphite, are critical to the operation of Rechargeable energy sourcesStorage devices such as lithium-Ion batteries and carbon-enhanced lead-acid battery. The insertion layer is considered to be carried out in a discrete phase where each stage represents the specific structure and chemical metrology of the insertion agent relative to the host. However, these threeThe dimensional structure of the stage between the uninserted layer and the fully inserted layer is unclear and does not understand the dynamics of the transition between stages. Using optical and scanning transmission electron microscopy, we recorded the insertion of graphite monocrystals in sulfuric acid. Here we find that the charge transfer in the plug-in is carried out through a highly variable current pulse, and although this is directly related to structural changes, it does not match the expectations of the classical theory. It is clear that random nano-defects dominate the insertion dynamics. Layered materials such as graphite (e. g. Transition metal dihalides) can absorb and release a large amount of charge reversibly. In the forward process known as the insertion layer, ions move and separate between Van der Waals-The bonding layer that forms the main crystal while keeping the individual layer itself relatively constant. In some applications, the resulting insert compound (ICs) acts as a precursor to the production of the peel-off layer material. In other applications (E. G. g. The reaction is the opposite. When the layer is removed, the mezzanine gallery is empty and the main body is restored to its initial structure approximately. The properties of reversible and large charge capacity make graphite ICs and other related materialsSuitable for electrode applications in rechargeable batteries (anode and cathode) and super capacitors. Although electrolytic plugging has been known since the 19 th century, it is critical for the operation of lithium, for exampleion and carbon-enhanced lead-Acid battery, is not very understanding of the structure of ICs. X-Ray and electron diffraction data show that the embedded layers are organized in layers in many integrated circuits, and these embedded layers themselves have regular spacing. The transition from the original crystal to the full plug-in layer, the main crystal passes through various stages, where the "stage" indicates the main layer separating each plug-in layer. Therefore, the first stage is fully inserted, and the second stage is semi-inserted. intercalated. First proposed by rüdorff and Hofmann (RH), the simplest structural model of staging ICs has an embedded layer spanning the entire crystal body. However, this naive model gives a physically unreasonable picture of any Delta transition of stage 1 except for 1 transition = 1 transition↔As the proposer himself pointed out, the transition. In order to take into account the various phase number transitions observed, Daumas and Hérold (DH) assume that for the phase> CUC1 embedded layer does not span the crystal, instead, it is organized in the gallery into "islands" that are very small compared to the crystal area, which are stacked into "domains" of a given stage number ". According to DH theory, these areas are reconfigured by sliding or diffusion to influence the stage transition. The insertion stacking density in the domain is not necessarily constant, and in some cases the external control variables change the insertion stacking density. For example, when the IC chemical metrology remains the same, the number of stages can be changed by changing the pressure or potential, and vice versa. Although DH theory provides a reasonable alternative to the RH model, it predicts the structure ofDomain itself and transition state-It has proved difficult to observe. Evidence of the existence of DH island (though, notably, not for the conventional stage domain) is obtained by cross-crossingFeCl is inserted into a segmented transmission electron microscope (TEM) to crush natural graphite ). But high-The resolution TEM findings of the commensurate SbCl graphite ICs support the RH model more than the DH model. Estimation of domain size due to molecules-scale to >1u2009μm. Coordinate DH theory with successful stripping of graphite ICs in phase 3 and phase 2and bi-There is also a problem with the graphene layer, because the atomic mechanism of the domain in the IC to produce the dispersed product sheet is not clear. Both the RH model and the DH model cannot be considered well. established. In this exchange, we study predictions shared by both models: as a function of the potential, current associated with phase transition↔Smaller larger. For example, the phase sequence 3→2→1 is expected to be associated with the storage charge change ΔQ, with a ratio of 1/12: 1/6: 1/2 relative to the full capacity of the electrode. These changes should be sudden for host crystals that are small enough and ideal. Taking into account the change in the filling density of the balanced insertion layer, a less sudden transition and a slightly modified ΔQ ratio are given, but the main qualitative features remain: the current with a lower phase number transition is higherUsing an optical microscope and a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM), we haveThe high quality single crystal of natural graphite in sulfuric acid was electrocuted and delaminated by cyclic KVA (CV. (The five films included in the support information provide a summary of the results. ) Our video data shows the contrast changes associated with the widely reproduced electrolytic charge transfer after the cycle. On the other hand, the details of the charge transfer are not well reproduced at each cycle, and the observed current pulse has no obvious pattern. In STEM experiments, we also observed irrevocable contrast changes, most notably during the first insertion cycle of the sample due to the insertion process rather than the beam damage. In general, the reversible contrast change in the sample is sudden and associated with an identifiable current pulse. Contrary to the expectations of DH and RH models, we do not see a larger low current pulse systemStage transition. Even with high-The insertion dynamics of graphite seem to be dominated by external factors such as dynamics, defects, and not internal thermodynamics.