WASHINGTON-It could be back, thanks to nuclear power. . . Democrats?
Several candidates vying for the party's presidential nomination in the 20 th century are promoting or showing an open attitude to expand the "next step"
As part of an option to actively respond to the effects of climate change, generate nuclear energy. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N. J. , Rep.
D-John DelaneyMd. , and Sen.
Amy in Chloe cloth charMinn.
Support the expansion of modern nuclear energy that must meet stricter safety standards.
Several other White House candidates, including the former Colorado governor.
On behalf of John hikenroperTim Ryan, D-Ohio, and Sen.
Elizabeth WarrenMass.
They said they were open to the idea of nuclear power but did not push it as part of their agenda.
Even the Green New Deal, the Democratic representative of New York.
Alexander occassio
Cortes's comprehensive social justice proposal to combat climate change does not rule out nuclear power expansion, although the original draft proposal calls for the closure of nuclear reactors in all countries within a decade.
"The United States must play a leading role in dealing with the world climate crisis, which must include the development of clean and innovative technologies, the following generation of nuclear energy, and this year, bookers said when joining a bipartisan team of colleagues
Introduce the nuclear power Leadership Act.
Wind farm: Will Wind Farm cause cancer?
Some of Trump's claims about the industry are global warming.
The possibility that humans cause global warming and other sciences is 9999%.
Based on the fact that climate change threatens animals: Trump pushed for "energy dominance" to squeeze polar bears, whales and songchickens, critics say, for a party that has been fiercely opposed to the industry a while ago, this seems to be a strange transition.
Former Vice President Gore, known for his environmental activism, opposed expanding nuclear power when he became 2000 Democratic presidential candidate.
Democratic MP Tom Steyer funded the climate change initiative in the ballot box and flirted with advocates for the presidential campaign, renewable fuels and improved energy storage, but not nuclear energy. And Sen.
I'm Bernie Sanders. Vt.
As the main candidate for the 2020 presidential nomination, he opposed the renewal of the existing permits because "toxic waste by-products from nuclear power plants are not worth taking the risk of technological benefits.
"Want to see the news of USA Today on WhatsApp?
Click on this link on your mobile device to get started, but asking the atmosphere to quickly remove carbon dioxide to remedy the warming planet means nuclear power can be seen at least for a second time.
"This is a pragmatic position," said Sam o'ry, executive director of the University of Chicago's Energy Policy Institute.
"I am not surprised that there is a group of national policymakers taking a progressive stance on tackling climate change and issues including nuclear energy.
"Support for nuclear power is not loud or good --laid-out publicly.
Instead, it is sold in a more subtle language as "all-of-the-
These are "strategies to replace fossil fuel sources of global warming ". Washington Gov.
Jay Inslee was primarily committed to addressing climate change during his presidential campaign. He said his "first" focus was on expanding alternative smarter energy storage technologies for renewable sources such as wind and solar.
But we should continue to explore the next step.
In a statement provided to USA Today, the governor said, "the new generation of advanced nuclear technology must be safe, competitive in price and have a plan to store waste . ".
Not every candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for president is a fan, reflecting similar differences in the environment. Sen.
D-Kamala HarrisCalif. , Sen.
Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N. Y. ,and Rep.
D-tusigabadHi.
Including those who oppose the use of nuclear technology on the clean energy menu.
Gabat criticized the Green New Deal for being too "vague" because it did not ban nuclear energy.
Want more election coverage for 2020?
Download the USA Today app.
According to government data, nuclear power plants are generated by 98 commercial reactors at 60 plants in 30 states, providing nearly 20% of the country's electricity.
That makes nuclear the biggest carbon supplier.
Free energy in AmericaS.
However, economic factors, mainly the production of cheap natural gas and the production of increasingly cheap renewable energy, are slowly leading to the shutdown of nuclear energy.
In addition, analysts said the decline in demand damaged profitability and operating costs were rising.
President Donald Trump, a climate change skeptic whose government has been supporting fossil fuels such as oil and coal, signed legislation in 2018 to expand the nuclear industry.
"Full review of the United StatesS.
The nuclear energy policy will help us find new ways to revitalize this important energy resource.
Since 2010, there is only one new nuclear power plant in the United States: Unit 2, Watt bar, Tennessee, USAS.
Energy Information Administration
According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, two other reactors are being built in Georgia.
But since 2013, six reactors in five plants have been sealed, and seven reactors in the other five plants will be retired within the next seven years, without new financial support, five reactors in four other plants are expected to close in the next few years, according to a report from the relevant league of scientists.
The Oyster Creek reactor in New Jersey produced the last megawatt of energy in September.
There are also two nuclear power plants-the Pilgrim nuclear power plant in Massachusetts and the Three mile Island nuclear power plant (Unit 1)
Retirement is expected later this year.
Security remains a major issue, and the second unit of the Three mile Island suffered partial melting 40 years ago, which remains the country's worst commercial nuclear accident.
The threat of terrorist attacks and the potential destruction of major hurricanes (
The nuclear power plant is located on or near the water body)
Increased anxiety.
Another problem is to find a permanent repository of nuclear waste, which has been bothering for many years.
Spent fuel is now stored in pools or concrete and steel "dry barrels" at the site of each operating reactor, as well as in the site of permanently closing the reactor.
NRC spokesman Scott Burnell wrote in an email that all of these sites already and will continue to have sufficient storage space for spent fuel.
But specifically, storage is one of the reasons Sanders and others have asked to suspend the renewal of nuclear power plant licenses.
Ori, an analyst at the University of Chicago, said the center
The left-wing-advocating nuclear energy-remains a strong voice in the Democratic Party.
"But that doesn't mean that the policy will not end up with a strong boycott of nuclear weapons from the party's leftmost and dominant voice in the climate policy campaign," he said . ".
"These things will eventually collide.